Legal Opinion

State v. McKinney

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 29, 2021No. 121150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 121,150 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ALVA BRYANT MCKINNEY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, the standard of review is whether, after reviewing all the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced that a rational fact-finder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Appellate courts do not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations. 2. A statute's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  2. Johnson v. Bass Pro Outdoor WorldCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API