Legal Opinion

Schmalz v. Maxwell

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1984No. C5-83-1806, C7-83-1855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This is an appeal from a $50,000 judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs in a replevin action. Post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial were denied. Defendants contend the judge’s findings are not consistent with the evidence at trial, and newly discovered evidence contradicts sworn testimony upon which the trial judge based his findings. We affirm.

FACTS

Dr. Jeanette Opsahl Vickery was appellant Vera Maxwell’s sister, and appellant Betty Allen is Maxwell’s daughter. Appellant Marjorie Ironside Barnes was a close friend of Vickery since…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bethel v. LinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Mineral Resources, Inc. v. Mahnomen Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Beckman v. RainesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Duka v. Hotel Associates, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sigurdson v. Isanti CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Galioto Towing LLC v. The Huntington National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  3. Schmalz v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API