Grantham v. Wilkes
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The appellees are the owners and publishers of a newspaper known as the Daily Herald, and are sued herein by the appellant for libel on a declaration alleging that they “published in the said newspaper owned by them as aforesaid, to-wit, the Daily Herald, with the circulation aforesaid, willfully, wantonly, maliciously, and falsely, the following publication of and concerning the plaintiff, B. F. Grantham, to-wit, Ghat the said Jeff Lacy was convicted entirely upon the testimony of one B. F. Grantham, which said testimony was unreliable, untrustworthy, and indicated very clearly that…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Burris v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1982
- Krebs v. McNealMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Winton v. PattersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
- Huckabee v. NashMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Iden v. Evans Model LaundryNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.