Legal Opinion
Ray v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 2, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 75-1272PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss invites the decision of this court. Bridwell, a *41former defendant, is no longer in the case, admittedly enjoying immunity from civil liability for acts performed in the course of his duties as a government official. Prior to hearing the motion, without objection, the court allowed plaintiff’s motion to amend to bring his cause under Title 28, Section 1346(a) (2) 1 and 2410 2, United States Code.
The complaint shows that plaintiff, attorney, who instituted this action pro se, in April of 1975, was employed by borrower John T.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- People of the State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States Department of Agriculture v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Beattie (In Re Beattie)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1983