Legal Opinion

Voedisch v. Town of Wolfeboro

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 14, 1992No. 90-479PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiffs, all owners of neighboring property, appeal the decision of the Superior Court (O’Neil, J.) denying an injunction, and finding that although the conveyance of a parcel of land violated the Town of Wolfeboro’s (the town) subdivision regulations, the use of the property did not violate either the town’s zoning ordinance or the restrictive covenants of the subdivision. On appeal the plaintiffs, in essence, raise three issues. First, noting that the initial transfer of the property was an illegal subdivision, they challenge the trial court’s equitable remedy for the subdivision…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Silver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Joslin v. Pine River Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. New Hampshire Donuts, Inc. v. SkipitarisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Perron v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bagko Development Co. v. DamitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Husnander v. Town of BarnsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Olszak v. Town of New HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Taber v. Town of WestmorelandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API