Legal Opinion

Elijah v. Mottinger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 25, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court, Hon. Milo P. Smith, Judge. Action of replevin for the possession of a team of horses and a wagon and harness. The action is based on a written contract which will be set out in the opinion. There was a trial to a jury and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The petition of the plaintiffs was based on the following written contract:

This agreement, made this 8th day of May, A. D. 1909, between Elijah & Winne, party of the first part, and B. F. Mottinger, party of the second part, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, as follows: The party of the first,part hereby agrees to sell to the party of the second part, on the performance of the agreement as hereinafter stated, all their rights, title and *373interest in and to the following described property now in their possession and located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa: One light gray gelding named Dan, six (6) years old; one…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  2. John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  3. Sewell v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. H. W. Gossard Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Nunngesser v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cram v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Wilson v. Airline Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API