Legal Opinion

State v. Marker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 2014No. DV1121520; A151727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, arguing that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for judgment of acquittal. A person commits sexual abuse in the first degree when that person “[s]ubjects another person to sexual contact and * * * [t]he victim is incapable of consent by reason of being *** physically helpless [.]” ORS 163.427(1)(a)(C). A person is “physically helpless” if that person “is unconscious or for any other reason is physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act.” ORS 163.305(5). The issue in this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LugoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. Tindall-MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API