Legal Opinion

State v. Tindall-Martin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 4, 2014No. 10122061, 11071269; A151559, A151560Published

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of a multitude of sex crimes against five different victims. In this consolidated appeal, he first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a mistrial during voir dire. We reject that assignment without further discussion. In his second and third assignments of error, he maintains that the trial court erroneously denied his motions for a judgment of acquittal on one count of first-degree sexual abuse and one count of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration. The issue that defendant raises in his second and third assignments is whether a victim who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API