Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Kartes

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cavalier County; Kneeshaw, J. Action by Allan Wilson against John Kartes. Judgment for plaintiff. From an order denying a new trial defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery, brought to recover possession of a bull claimed to be unjustly detained by the defendant. The issues raised by the pleadings were submitted to *93a jury, and a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was rendered. A motion for a new trial was duly made, based on a statement of the case duly settled, and the motion denied. Judgment was entered on the verdict. The defendant" appeals to this court from such order denying a new trial.

(88 N. W. Rep. 1023.)

The appellant has wholly failed to comply with the rules of this court in relation to making and’subjoining to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glaspell v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  2. J. E. Paulson & Co. v. WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hostetter v. Brooks Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. O'Brien v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Globe Investment Co. v. BoyumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glaspell v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sucker State Drill Co. v. BrockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Marck v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API