The BORDEN COMPANY v. Dollar
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Where it affirmatively appears from the award in a workmen’s compensation proceeding that it is based upon an erroneous legal theory, the case should be remanded to the board for further findings. Wilson v. Swift & Co., 68 Ga. App. 701 (23 S. E. 2d 261). The award of the single director in this case appears to have been based on the erroneous legal theory that when a claimant in a workmen’s compensation case is shown to have been injured while driving his automobile at a greater-speed than that allowed by law he is as a matter of law and under all circumstances precluded from recovery. That…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Reid v. RaperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barbree v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- General Motors Corporation v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Department of Transportation v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Waters v. National Biscuit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.