Legal Opinion
Department of Transportation v. Livaditis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 15, 1973No. 47881PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The first headnote requires no elaboration.
Three of the twenty-seven enumerations of error deal with the rejection of certain evidence sought to be introduced by the plaintiff. The trial judge found that the plaintiff had failed to provide the condemnee with certain plans under a notice to produce. He therefore excluded further oral testimony sought to be elicited with regard to the plans.
Section 37 of the Civil Practice Act (Code Ann. § 81A-137; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 650; 1967, pp. 226, 235) provides that upon failure to produce under Section 34 of the Civil Practice Act…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- HOUSING AUTHORITY &C. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Barbree v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. LoftisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- State Highway Department v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- King v. City of McCaysvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Georgia Department of Human Resources v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Wrege v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Coffee v. Atkinson CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Sloan v. Sarah Rhodes, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- NORTON REALTY & LOAN COMPANY, INC. v. Bd. of Ed. of Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.