Legal Opinion

Mischnick v. Dime Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 7, Calendar No. 36,381Published

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiff, wanting to send $197.60 to Jacob Will at Worms, Germany, visited defendant’s branch bank in the city of Detroit, February 6, 1922, and purchased, paid for, and received the following instrument which he sent to the payee in Germany.

“THE DIME SAYINGS BANK.

9-21

“CHEQUE FOR No. 1902
“38,000 German Marks DETROIT, MICHIGAN

Feb. 6-1922

“Pay to the order of Mr. Jacob Will the sum of thirty-eight thousand German marks.

To Filiale Der Pfalzischen Bank

“Worms, A. Rh.

Lloyd J. Saxton

‘ ‘ Germany

Mgr.

‘ ‘ Sherman-Chene Branch. ’ ’

The payee, in due time, presented the bill of exchange to the proper bank…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gorsche v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kardynal v. GrezezinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API