Legal Opinion
Kardynal v. Grezezinski
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 78, Calendar No. 34,458PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
The suit is on four drafts drawn by defendant to plaintiff on banks in Poland. Defendant had judgment on trial before the court, upon findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The drafts were not protested for nonpayment, as is required of foreign bills of exchange by the negotiable instruments law, 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9401.
The Polish banks claimed the drafts were never presented to them. Plaintiff testified that he presented the drafts, payment was refused, and the bank officials told him defendant had no funds or credit with them to pay the drafts. The testimony of the facts of presentment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- First National Bank v. CurrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Gorsche v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Mazukiewicz v. Hanover National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Mazukiewicz v. Hanover National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mischnick v. Dime Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1932