Legal Opinion

State v. E.J.H.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 26, 1992No. 29381-8-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

E.H., a juvenile, moved for accelerated review of a 52-week manifest injustice disposition imposed following his conviction of possession with intent to deliver cocaine. A commissioner of this court referred the matter to a 3-judge panel for accelerated review without oral argument. We affirm the sentence.

Facts

At the age of 13, E.H. was charged with and convicted of possession with intent to deliver cocaine, based upon his participation in a sale of cocaine to an undercover officer in downtown Seattle.

Disposition on the charge, in addition to numerous other convictions, took place on October…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BryanWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. State v. TaualaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. State v. S.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. State v. BourgeoisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API