Legal Opinion

In re Rogers

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 11, 2013No. GL 13-01464PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DENYING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTOR’S PROPOSED CHAPTER 13 PLAN

JAMES D. GREGG, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. ISSUE.

May a chapter 13 plan be confirmed that modifies a protected residential mortgage so attorneys’ fees may be paid first?

II. JURISDICTION.

This court has jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case. 28 U.S.C. § 1334. This bankruptcy case and all related proceedings have been referred to this court for decision. 28 U.S.C. § 157(a); L.Civ.R. 83.2(a) (W.D. Mich.). This contested matter is a core proceeding and this court may enter a final order. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L) (confirmations of plans).

*539III.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re HirschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. In re CrippsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
  3. In re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
  4. Stevens v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (In re Stevens)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  5. In re HelligrathUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API