Magone v. Origet
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Southern District of New York. Tills was an action by Arthur Origet against Daniel Magone, collector of the port of New 'York, to recover duties alleged to have been illegally exacted. The circuit court directed a verdict, for the plaintiff, and entered judgment accordingly. The defendant; appeals.
Read the full summary
In Error to tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Southern District of New York. Tills was an action by Arthur Origet against Daniel Magone, collector of the port of New 'York, to recover duties alleged to have been illegally exacted. The circuit court directed a verdict, for the plaintiff, and entered judgment accordingly. The defendant; appeals. In 188?' Arthur Origet imported into the port oí Now York, by the vessels La Champagne, Aurania, Adriatic, and Umbria, merchandise specified in four invoices and lour entiles, which consisted of woolen cloths, to he used for over-coa rs,…
1Opinion of the CourtShipman, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts). The defendant below excepted to sundry questions, addressed to Mr. Baudoine, which were intended to elicit from him the fact that, in the reap-praisement, items of cost were added to the invoice prices which were prohibited, by section 7 of the áct of March 3, 1883 (22 Stat. 523), from being regarded in estimating the dutiable value of imported goods. For example, the witness was asked “if there was any item of cost covered by your advance to invoice prices on this invoice other than the cost of cutting the goods into cut lengths, you may state what that item of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Passavant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kirtz v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Minahan v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Buckbee v. P. Hohenadel, Jr., Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Butcher v. ButcherColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.