Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yelle

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 12, 1985PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

We are obliged to reverse judgments of conviction of rape (G. L. c. 265, § 22[b]) and of related assault and battery (G. L. c. 265, § 13A) 1 because of overreaching by the Commonwealth, objected to by the defense, but allowed, unchecked, by the judge. As will appear, the overreaching consisted of the introduction by the Commonwealth of evidence of an incident that occurred before the episode in suit which added no or at best only minimal probative value to the Commonwealth’s case, but at the same time was calculated to create unfair prejudice against the defendant.

1. Prejudicial error, (a)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. BradshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. GallisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. HelfantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. SevieriMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. RancourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API