Totten v. Detroit Aluminum & Brass Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.
This suit is in the form of a common-law action, trespass on the case. Defendant claims' the action is of such nature that under our statute, it is not cognizable by a court of common-law-jurisdiction. :
Defendant took the deposition of plaintiff, Dale1 H. Totten, as cross-examination, which deposition was filed on April 30, 1954, the same day on which' defendant’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings was filed. The motion was denied by the court'on May 24,1954. On leave granted, defendant took an appeal in the nature of certiorari from the order of the trial court denying the motion for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Munson v. ChristieMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Dailey v. River Raisin Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cunningham v. CunninghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Herman v. TheisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Panagos v. North Detroit General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Neal v. Roura Iron Works, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Demkiw v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.