Legal Opinion

Theodore C. Ruark v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1965No. 8241_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant is presently confined in the Colorado State Penitentiary pursuant to a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed thereupon by the District Court of Jefferson County, Colorado. He seeks release from custody by a writ of habeas corpus.

The record shows that after conviction and sentence, Ruark requested that counsel be appointed for him to perfect an appeal to the Colorado Supreme Court and that such request was denied. He then perfected his appeal pro se and the conviction was affirmed. 1 The United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari. 2 Thereafter, appellant petitioned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ruark v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ruark v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Ruark v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Ruark v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cruz v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API