Legal Opinion
Armistead v. C & M Transport, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 13, 1995No. 94-1525PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellee Travelers Insurance Company (“Travelers”) removed this action to the federal district court despite the provision in 28 U.S.C. § 1445(e) forbidding removal of cases arising under state workers’ compensation laws. ' Plaintiff-appellant Clyde Ar-mistead unsuccessfully resisted the removal on jurisdictional grounds, but overlooked the bar of section 1445(c). The district court granted summary judgment in Travelers’ favor. On appeal, Armistead for the first time invokes section 1445(c). We hold that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdic tion in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Travelers Property Casualty v. GoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Satinder S. Rekhi v. Wildwood Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Rando v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.