Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Erickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2016No. 92489-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion was filed for record at ~-·.()0~ on~.?OI{p ~~LO 1 · Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JESS NELSON, an individual, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 92489-9 ) v. ) En Bane ) MICHAEL ERICKSON and JANE DOE ) Filed _ _ 1 _13_2~_16_____ A_UG__ ERICKSON, and the marital community ) composed thereof, ) ) Respondents. ) _______________________) OWENS, J. - In many civil cases, arbitration is mandatory. After arbitration, either party can request a full trial, but if they do not improve their position from arbitration, they have to pay the opposing party's attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Niccum v. EnquistWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cormar, Ltd. v. SauroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Nelson v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API