Hayes v. . Forty-Second St., Etc., R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant company makes two objections to the recovery in this case. Upon proof that the notice required by the General Railroad Act was posted in the car, and that plaintiff was riding upon the platform and was upon the step when injured, in disregard of that notice, his contributory negligence was asserted. In Nolan v. Brooklyn City Newtown R.R. Co. (87 N.Y. 63) we did not decide that the provision of the General Railroad Act referred to applied to street railroads. It was enough in that case, that if it did, the notice proved was insufficient, and that was the only answer deemed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nolan v. . Brooklyn City Newtown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Palmer v. . D. H.C. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Dochtermann v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RoseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Dong Chong v. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.