Legal Opinion
McKinney v. East Orange Mun. Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 31, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
284 N.J. Super. 639 (1995)
666 A.2d 191
CAROLYN MCKINNEY, INDIVIDUALLY, GABRIEL MCKINNEY, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, CAROLYN MCKINNEY, DAVID MCKINNEY, JR., BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, CAROLYN MCKINNEY, AND DAVID MCKINNEY, SR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
EAST ORANGE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ANTHONY WOODSON, JOHN DOE (FICTITIOUS NAME) AND RICHARD ROE (FICTITIOUS NAME), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 27, 1995.
Decided October 31, 1995.
Before Judges PRESSLER, KEEFE and WEFING.
Emanuel Needle argued the cause for appellants (Kohn & Needle,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Casamasino v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Plummer v. Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Wildoner v. Borough of RamseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Simmons v. LooseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Maudsley v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.