Legal Opinion

Dews v. SHMUKLER

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1962No. Appeal, 157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an appeal by Nathan Shmukler, one of two defendants, in a claim for compensation for injuries sustained by Grady Dews, Jr., a minor, under the provisions of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The facts, which are for the most part undisputed, disclose that the claimant, fourteen years of age, had been employed by Jack Shmukler on many occasions to assist Mm in Ms business of huckstering eggs. On August 16, 1957, claimant reported to Jack Shmukler for employment and was told by him that his nephew, Nathan Shmukler, had borrowed one of his trucks for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Erwin v. L. & H. CONSTRUCTION CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Powell v. Hills GarageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Rodgers v. Methodist Episcopal HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Tomshuck v. Wallin Concrete Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ashman v. Sharon Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Krasznay v. Milton Ross Metals Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Martin v. ReckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Wingert & Brechbill v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API