Legal Opinion

Pope v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1931No. 20677PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

D. F. Pope was charged in the first count of an indictment with forging a will, and in the second count with uttering and publishing as true the forged will; and was convicted on the second count only. The bill of exceptions assigns error upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the defendant’s plea in abatement and dismissing said plea, as shown by exceptions pendente lite; and upon the overruling of the defendant’s demurrer to the indictment, as shown by exceptions pendente lite; and upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

1. The plea in abatement alleges in substance that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Oglesby v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. State v. RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Rozier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Teasley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API