Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Bruton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 2, 1914No. 20,401PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Suit by William Stiles against James Bruton. Erom dismissal, Prentice E. Edrington, Jr., applies for wilts of certiorari and prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

[1,2] Plaintiff, William Stiles, entered into a contract .with P. E. Edrington, Jr., attorney at law, September 24,. 1913, under Act No. 124, 1906, p. 210. That act provides, in addition to the privilege given to an attorney at law on the judgment, and property recovered by judgment, for his client, that he, the attorney, has the right to enter into a written contract to be signed by the client, by which'—

“attorneys at law may acquire as their fee in such matter an interest in the subject-matter of the suit, proposed suit, or claim, in the prosecution or defense of which they are employed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lyon Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Davis Finance & Securities Co. v. O'NealLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Husk v. BlancandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Succession of VlahoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Succession of JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API