Legal Opinion
Davis Finance & Securities Co. v. O'Neal
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 1935No. 16042PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LECHE, Judge.
Claude W. Duke, appellant, represented, as attorney, A. Deutsche O’Neal, intervenor, in the case of Piazza v. MacDonald et al. in which case judgment was obtained in favor of intervenor decreeing him to be the owner of certain funds in the hands of the H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., in the sum of $125.18, this judgment being affirmed by this court in the case of Piazza v. MacDonald et al. (O’Neal, Intervener) 154 So. 71.
In the case now before us, Davis Finance & Securities Company, Inc., v. A. Deutsche O’Neal, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against A. D. O’Neal in the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Louque v. DejanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Deardorf v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Fuselier v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- McClung v. Atlas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Calk v. Highland Const. & Mfg.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Roberts v. Hanover Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Worldwide Remediation, Inc. v. Onebane, Bernard, Torian, Diaz, McNamara & Abell Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Succession of JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Calk v. Highland Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.