Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. Engels
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided April 20, 1989No. 89-0001-CIVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
SCOTT, District Judge.
In preparation for the Criminal Contempt and Rule 11 Hearing scheduled in this case on April 28, 1989, Defendants’ Counsel has noticed Bruce Wishnefsky for a deposition and directed him to bring all documents relating to Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Wishnefsky has filed a Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash, claiming that these documents “pertain entirely to the representation of persons making claims for benefits under the Social Security Act,” and that he is therefore prohibited from disclosing them on the basis of the Social…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1966
- Gilley v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
- Tootle v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mason v. South Bend Community School Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997