Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Ayeni, Shola

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 20, 2004No. 02-3119Published

1ConcurrenceTatel, Circuit Judge

“It goes without saying that few institutions are as venerable as that of trial by jury, enshrined at the Founding in the Bill of Rights and hallowed by an enormous body of English and American law that commands judges ... not to invade the province of judgment by the people.” Stacey v. Allied Stores Corp., 768 F.2d 402, 406 (D.C.Cir.1985). Implicating both that venerable institution and that command, this case presents the question whether supplemental arguments in response to juries’ factual questions — a procedure so unusual that its use in a federal criminal case has apparently never been…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API