Legal Opinion

Jones v. Morrison

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1922No. Civil No. 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanigan, J.

This action was brought by appellee to recover upon appellant’s promissory note. Appellant answered, admitting the execution of the note and its nonpayment, but for a special defense alleged that the note is “extortionate, unconscionable, usurious and void and was exacted of defendant as a penalty,” by reason of the following circumstances: That before the execution of the note plaintiff had made an agreement in writing with L. W. Williams and I. G. Masters by which he agreed to sell and convey to the said Williams and Masters certain real estate for the purchase price of $13,200, payable in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Wilson's v. DeenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Roberts v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bryan v. PinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. FordArizona Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cassia Creek Reservoir Co. v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jeune v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Upton Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Wallace v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Jeune v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API