Legal Opinion

Kimbrough v. Hornsby

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM MEIGS. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Meigs. County.— T. M. McConnell, .Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The question presented for onr determination upon this record is in respect of the title to a promissory note, and more especially whether a bona fide purchaser of the note, for value, before maturity, will acquire a su*607perior right .to that of an attaching creditor of the original payee, i

The contest is between one B. F. Hayes, who purchased the note from Crabtree, the original payee, and Kimbrough et ah, who are attaching creditors of Crab-tree.

Complainants, Kimbrough et al., on the 21st of October, 1901, filed their original attachment and injunction bill in the chancery court of Meigs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Pickler v. RaineyTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barham v. DenisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Morrison v. ButtramTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Peoples National Bank of Washington v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sentinel Fire Ins. Co. v. NallTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Pepper/Holt Joint Venture v. Roderick Group, Inc. (In re Hodevco, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API