Legal Opinion

State v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1970No. 28PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, Justice

Defendant contends that the admission of his alleged confession violated his constitutional rights because it was the product of illegal custodial interrogation. He contends that he was arrested and detained without probable cause.

An arrest without a warrant, except as authorized by-statute, is illegal. State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100; State v. Moore, 275 N.C. 141, 166 S.E. 2d 53.

G.S. 15-41, in part, provides: “A peace officer may without a warrant arrest a person .... (2) When the officer has reasonable ground to believe that the person to be arrested has committed a felony and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API