Legal Opinion

Catron v. Rueckhaus

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1988No. 8224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

Fletcher R. Catron (Catron), personal representative, appeals from an order fixing his fee, attorney fees and costs. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new hearing.

This ease comes before the court for decision after it was submitted to an advisory committee pursuant to an experimental plan. See Patterson v. Environmental Improvement Div., 105 N.M. 320, 731 P.2d 1364 (Ct.App.1986); Boucher v. FoxworthGalbraith Lumber Co., 105 N.M. 442, 733 P.2d 1325 (Ct.App.1986); Stoll v. Dow, 105 N.M. 316, 731 P.2d 1360 (Ct.App.1986). The committee was, however, unable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fryar v. JohnsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Bird v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Paternoster v. La Cuesta Cabinets, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of GreigNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. DanekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. DanekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API