Legal Opinion

Burchinell v. Hirsh

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

This replevin suit grew out of a dispute between the vendors and attaching creditors of a bankrupt merchant. During 1891, David Cohen was dealing in ready-made clothing and its usual accessories in the city of Denver. In the latter part of that year, some of the employees of-the commercial agencies of Dun & Co., and Bradstreet & Co., obtained from Cohen information respecting his financial affairs. About the same time he transmitted to Benjamin & Co-, of New York, a statement of. his assets. In April, 1892, the appellees, Hirsh, Elson & Co., through their traveling salesman, sold Cohen a bill…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zucker v. KarpelesMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hotchkin v. Third National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Gainesville National Bank v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Garbutt v. Bank of Prairie du ChienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Morrill v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David Adler & Sons Clothing Co. v. ThorpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. German National Bank of Ripon v. Princeton State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API