Legal Opinion

Smith v. Supervalu, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 23, 1998No. 96 C 744Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEVIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a diversity action, involving the tort of negligence, arising under Illinois law. Pending is a summary judgment motion by Defendant Supervalu, Inc., d/b/a Cub Foods. For the reasons set forth below, this court denies the motion.

BACKGROUND FACTS1

On January 22, 1994, Plaintiff Dorothy Smith worked for Aetmedia, a corporation involved in the advertisement of various household products at various grocery stores. (Def.l2(m) ¶ 5.) Plaintiff worked as an “ad changer,” replacing ad machines and coupon dispensers on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API