Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The Court orders that the plaintiffs-appellants’ motion for reconsideration is granted. The Court’s opinion issued in these consolidated cases on February 22,2005, is hereby vacated inasmuch as this Court did not have jurisdiction to issue that opinion.
The Court furthers orders that this Court’s opinion issued on June 24, 2004, in these consolidated cases is reissued and reinstated as of the date of the Clerk’s certification of this order, and is the opinion of the Court.
The Court further orders that this Court’s opinion issued on June 24, 2004, in Tingley v Kortz, 262 Mich App 583 (2004), is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tingley v. KortzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Tingley v. WARDROP IIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005