Legal Opinion

Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLC

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 2005No. Docket Nos. 243171, 244609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court orders that the plaintiffs-appellants’ motion for reconsideration is granted. The Court’s opinion issued in these consolidated cases on February 22,2005, is hereby vacated inasmuch as this Court did not have jurisdiction to issue that opinion.

The Court furthers orders that this Court’s opinion issued on June 24, 2004, in these consolidated cases is reissued and reinstated as of the date of the Clerk’s certification of this order, and is the opinion of the Court.

The Court further orders that this Court’s opinion issued on June 24, 2004, in Tingley v Kortz, 262 Mich App 583 (2004), is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tingley v. KortzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Tingley v. 900 MONROE LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Tingley v. WARDROP IIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API