Legal Opinion

Westphal v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1932No. Civ. No. 8354Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Application for writ of prohibition to prevent a receiver appointed by respondent court from further interfering with the property of petitioner.

It is claimed the appointment was void for the reason that there was a noncompliance with the provisions of section 566 of the Code of Civil Procedure with reference to the bond required by that section. Under authority of Ryan v. Murphy, 39 Cal. App. 640 [179 Pac. 517], Van Alen v. Superior Court, 37 Cal. App. 696 [174 Pac. 672], Bibby v. Dieter, 15 Cal. App. 45 [113 Pac. 874], and Davila v. Heath, 13 Cal. App. 370 [109 Pac. 893], the writ…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Bibby v. DieterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Davila v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Van Alen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API