Legal Opinion
Dipasquale v. Hawkins
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 3, 2020No. 3:16-cv-00219Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Charles DiPasquale, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:16-cv-219 v. Judge Thomas M. Rose Detective James Hawkins, et al, Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT JAMES HAWKINS, (ECF 155), GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT MARK HERRES, (ECF 154), AND TERMINATING CASE. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL FEDERAL CLAIMS. THE COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT MARK HERRES’S STATE LAW CLAIMS FOR…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Manuel v. City of JolietSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.