Legal Opinion

Mains v. Cosner

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cass County; the Hon. Charles Turner, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lawrence

We find no grounds in this record for reversing the judgment. The admission of testimony that the defendant had promised marriage was in conformity with nearly all the authorities. The evidence was admissible, because tending to show that the defendant sought the society of plaintiff’s daughter under the pretense of honorable motives, and that the illicit intercourse was, therefore, the result of seduction on his part in the strict sense of the term. The court properly instructed the jury that they were not to consider the promise of marriage in aggravation of damages in this action. The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. LanglassIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Grace & Hyde Co. v. SanbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Mighell v. StoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API