Legal Opinion

Grace & Hyde Co. v. Sanborn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,183PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Robert W. Wright, Judge, presiding. .Heard in this court at the March term, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

It is urged in argument by the appellant’s counsel in this case that the trial judge in the Superior Court committed an error vitiating the verdict and judgment by allowing and authorizing the jury, without the consent and in the absence of the defendant’s counsel, to seal their verdict and separate on June 24, 1904. The point is not well taken. It has long been settled to the contrary in this State. Mains v. Cosner, 62 Ill., 465; City of Chicago v. Langlass, 66 Ill., 361; C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Monaghan, 140 Ill., 474.

Again, it is said that another error was committed by the trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Sargent Co. v. BaublisIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Consolidated Coal Co. v. ScheiberIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Keegan v. KinnareIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Joliet Steel Co. v. ShieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Electric Co. v. RooneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. Diamond Glue Co. v. WietzychowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Hackett v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Skulimowski v. DeahlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Kelleher v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API