Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. St. John

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The defendants, severally, were charged each with taking clams illegally at Quincy on February 9, 1927, from tidal waters and flats proscribed as contaminated under G. L. c. 130, § 137, and with having in his possession clams so taken. The defendant St. John was charged, in addition, with transporting clams so taken. In the Superior Court, on appeal, they were found guilty and sentences were imposed.

The cases are before us upon exceptions claimed to the denial by the Superior Court of motions for bills of particulars; to the refusal to direct verdicts of not guilty; to the admission of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SlavskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Allen v. KiddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Jewett v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Whiton v. Albany City InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. GiacomazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. BinkiewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Commonwealth v. MannosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API