Webster v. Berry
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Barton Circuit Court. — Hon. R. Cf. Thurman, Judge. “The abstract should indicate by its own internal arrangement what is record proper, and what is matter abstracted from the bill of exceptions, where the one ends and the other begins.” Thompson v. Rud-dick, 213 Mo. 564. Stark v. Zeiinder, 204 M'o. 448; Harding v. Bedoll, 202 Mo. 630; Pennoffsky v. Coerver, 205 Mo. 137; Heltzell & Co. y. McDowell, 135 Mo. App. 204; Macon ex rel. v. Jaeger, 133 Mo. App. 643.’
1Opinion of the CourtNixon, P. J.
This case in its peregrinations reminds us of the much traveled Homeric hero who was buffeted and baffled on many climes and shores. The appellant was sued in his own neighborhood before a justice of the peace the result being a mistrial. He filed an affidavit against the inhabitants of the township. Thereupon, the case took another turn into another township, where, more fortunately for the plaintiff in the result, the jury returned a verdict against the defendant. Prom this the defendant appealed. He then filed an affidavit against the judge of the circuit court and the case was transferred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Everett v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Harris v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Isaac C. Novinger & Son v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ollar-Robinson Co. v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Mathis v. BaxterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910