State v. Snowden, 2008-A-0014 (12-12-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, State of Ohio, appeals from the judgment entry of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, granting Appellee, Gene Snowden's Motion for a New Trial. Due to the court's conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury's verdict, we need not reach the merits of the State's argument as the instant appeal is both constitutionally and statutorily barred. Therefore, for the reasons discussed below, the State's appeal is hereby dismissed.
{¶ 2} Gene Snowden is the grandson of Thelma Haught. In March of 2001, shortly after the death of Haught's husband,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LanierOhio Court of Appeals · 2019