Legal Opinion

United States v. Serges Jacques Descent

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 28, 2002No. 01-14735PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Serges Jacques Descent appeals his convictions and sentences for mail fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy. Finding no error in the district court’s denial of Descent’s motion for judgment of acquittal, and concluding that the district court was correct in not grouping the money laundering and fraud counts for purposes of sentencing, we affirm those decisions. Because the district court erred in modifying the jury instructions related to forfeiture, however, we vacate the forfeiture judgment and remand for entry of a new forfeiture judgment.

I. Background

Descent was indicted on fifty-seven…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Christian A. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Kristopher Douglas WardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Walter Lewis Clark, Iii, and George R. Newton, Moody Nichols, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Edgar Jamal GamoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Miguel PerezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Michael PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API