Legal Opinion

Barton v. Cannon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1971No. 10582PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

All original parties to the matters at issue here are now deceased. Defendant F. R. Cannon, now deceased, executed mortgages covering the same piece of real property both to one J. B. Penard and one Mabel Nelson. The Penard mortgage was executed prior in time but recorded subsequent in time to the Nelson mortgage. In July of 1965, Cannon was in default on the Nelson mortgage and, for the purpose of avoiding foreclosure of the Nelson mort*423gage, executed a warranty deed covering the property to Mrs. Nelson. Their agreement provided that upon delivery of the deed the Nelson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holzmeyer v. Van DorenOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Prather v. Industrial Investment CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fowler v. CarterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stewart v. Hood CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Rasmuson v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Verbillis v. Dependable Appliance Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Citizens State Bank of New Castle v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API