Legal Opinion

Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 20, 1984No. C80-1733PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM K. THOMAS, Senior District Judge.

In separate but related motions filed on April 15, 1982, defendants Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B & 0), Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (C & 0), CSX Corporation, Chessie Systems, Inc. (sometimes collectively referred to as Chessie), Norfolk & Western Railway Company (N & W), and Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company (B & LE) move to dismiss plaintiff Pinney Dock & Transport Company’s (Pinney) complaint seeking damages for alleged

injuries to plaintiffs business and property caused by defendants’ violations of sections 1 and…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pinney Dock And Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. In re Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1984
  5. Frontier Enterprises, Inc. v. Amador Stage Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API