Legal Opinion

Kisliuk v. City of Fort Bragg

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 24, 2024No. 1:23-cv-06358Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 DANIEL KISLIUK, Case No. 23-cv-06358-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 10 v. TO DISMISS 11 CITY OF FORT BRAGG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff Mr. Kisliuk, proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 15

1983 alleging that the City of Fort Bragg (“the City”) and several of its police officers violated his 16 constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. First Amend. Compl. (“FAC”) 17 (Dkt. 21) at 7-8. On behalf of all…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API