Legal Opinion
Keezer v. Spickard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1992No. C3-92-1018PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Rock Keezer argues the trial court improperly granted summary judgment against his claims that respondents violated his rights under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Rock Keezer suffers from a mental illness and occasionally must be hospitalized for treatment. Keezer receives medical assistance from Mahnomen County. Mahnomen County Human Ser vices Department employee Anita Olson has been Keezer’s caseworker for about two years.
On April 16, 1992, the Keezer family’s community support person told Olson…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Deli v. HasselmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- RGIS Inventory Specialists v. PalmerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Everest Development, Ltd. v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.