Dollarhide v. Hopkins
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, on promissory notes. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Edgar County; the Hon. Ferdinand Bookwalter, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1897. Affirmed. Opinion filed December 2, 1897.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Harker
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a suit on two promissory notes, executed by appellee to M. Rumely & Co., and assigned to appellant before maturity. June 23, 1892, appellant, as agent of Rumely & Co., an Indiana corporation engaged in manufacturing grain separators, sold to appellee, for §430, a separator for threshing small grain, for which the notes sued on were executed. There was a general warranty that the machine properly handled would thresh and clean grain as well as any other separator of like size in the United States. It was also provided in…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Harter v. Peoples Bank of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Kentucky Rock Asphalt Co. v. Mazza's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Pierce v. . CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Peltier v. McFersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Cook v. AugustusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916