Legal Opinion

Fred Kuchenig v. The California Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 10, 1965No. 20803PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

In this diversity action conflicting claims of the plaintiff and of the State of Louisiana to oil-rich water bottoms raise the question whether the State (a) in its capacity as the defendant’s lessor and also (b) in its capacity as a sovereign State asserting title to allegedly inalienable beds of navigable waters is an indispensable party defendant.

The land in suit is in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. It is covered by the waters of Breton Sound, an arm of the Gulf of Mexico. The plaintiff, Fred Zuchenig, a resident of Missouri, is the adopted son and sole heir of his…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nathaniel P. Broussard v. Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. In Re Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Brinco Mining Ltd. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  4. Hardy Lee Jamison, Jr., Father and Next of Kin of Hardy Lee Jamison, Iii, Deceased v. Memphis Transit Management CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  5. Lang v. Windsor Mount Joy Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API